My perspective comes from a 1st-year graduate student who has been using DoctoralNet for the last 4 months to help orient me for my Ph.D. Journey as a Biochemistry student. Additionally, I have been working in close contact with four faculty members over the past 2 years through start-up company-sponsored research; I have some perspective of hearing from graduate students and advisors. This feedback is given in good faith to promote good practice and not to slander the efforts of good and hardworking people trying to accomplish difficult tasks.In my experience, DoctoralNet so far has mainly served as a constellation for me in my voyage towards graduation. The process maps available on the website, although usually not geared towards Ph.D. candidates in the sciences, help address the 50,000ft view of the dissertation process. The web seminars allow for open discussion of best practice and soft skills, and the boxed sets do give some good 'logic' processes' to evaluate my research methodology and validity. Areas which I believe DoctoralNet could grow would be firstly in the teaching of their concepts/methods, as of now they are generally referred to or written about in articles whcih requires the commitment from the student to navigate how they may apply to their work. Additionally it would be good to see the expansion of tools which address the research question portions of the dissertations such as teaching the scientific method, how to ask a good research question, and how to do a good literature review in your field, etc.As a graduate student of a large research institution, in my very humble opinion having never been an administrator, I believe that the success of the educational goal of the university is mainly won and lost by the faculty who have far too much responsibility (undergraduate teaching, graduate teaching, undergraduate lab mentoring, graduate lab mentoring, outreach and research talks, compendiums, lab management, lab budgeting for major technical purchases, writing of papers, textbooks, and grants etc.) and far too little mentorship and support. DoctoralNet I believe is a tool that helps alleviate some of the graduate students need for mentorship and navigation from the PI and possibly provide a mechanism to educate the PI's in their mentorship of graduate students-- giving both parties a common ground to come to in their roadmap for graduation. I feel much more capable as 'the captain of my thesis' having some "constellations" that are designed from a third party (that is not making money from me or off of my work) that is devoted to empowering graduate students to complete their degrees, providing incentive for the promotion of good scientist and by default good science.